| 277 | 4 | 28 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
在宋代,围绕着巫山神女的辩诬问题,对于宋玉及其《高唐赋》《神女赋》的批评出现了两种截然不同的观点:一是认为宋玉"妄"作神女故事,"诬"神女于不贞,玷污了神女的形象;一是认为宋玉所赋"发乎情止乎礼义","得诗人风化之本",而巫山神女的被玷污是后人所为,与宋玉无关。我们认为前一种观点是在理学影响下的主观情绪化的不切实际的批评,而后一种观点能够发展地科学地客观地看问题,是对宋玉及其《高唐赋》和《神女赋》的正确的批评。
Abstract：In Song Dynasty people held two different ideas on Goddess of Wu Mountain and Song Yu's description of it.One is that Song Yu's description sullied Goddess's image,and the other is that the tarnish was made by the later generation and had nothing to do with Song Yu.We think that the second view is the correct and objective critics on this matter.
[1]李善:李善《高唐赋》题下注[M].上海:上海书店(影印清胡克家刻本《文选》),1988.
[2]李善:李善《高唐赋》“妾巫山之女也”注[M].上海:上海书店(影印清胡克家刻本《文选》),1988.
[3]郦道元.水经注[M].上海:商务印书馆,1958.
[4]宋玉.神女赋所言之巫山当在古云梦中,即今湖北武汉西之仙女山。参见刘刚《宋玉辞赋考论》第四章所收《巫山考——宋玉辞赋地名考之三》[M].沈阳:辽海出版社,2006.
[5]刘刚.论五代两宋艳词使用宋玉典故与其对宋玉接受之影响[J].鞍山师范学院学报,2009,(5):26-31.
基本信息:
中图分类号:I206.2
引用信息:
[1]刘刚.宋人关于巫山神女的辩诬与其对宋玉神女描写的批评[J].鞍山师范学院学报,2010,12(03):22-25.
2010-06-20
2010-06-20