nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2001, 04, 52-56
宋玉作《招魂》说新证
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
摘要:

《招魂》的作者,汉王逸定为宋玉所作,宋元以前并无异议,明时始有人提出怀疑,以为为屈原所作,遂引起古今学界持久的争论,虽然,众说纷纭,莫衷一是,但是,也取得了一些共识。我们以前人的研究成果为基础,对招魂的地点、对象、作者作了进一步的考证,认为招魂的地点在楚国最后一个都城寿春,招魂的对象是楚考烈王,其作者应遵从王逸的说法,“《招魂》者,宋玉之所作也。”

Abstract:

In Han Dynasty,WANG Yi figured Zhao Hun was written by SONG Yu.The opinion was accepted until Song and Yuan Dynasty.In Ming Dynasty,someone doubted Zhao Hun’s writer,which was QU Yuan in stead of SONG Yu,and it brought persistant discussion.For many years,the scholars cann’t solve the problem,however,they agreed on some points.On the basis of previnient studies,we have explored the site,object and the author further.We consider the people searched soles in Shouchun,which is Chu’s last capital.The object that the people search for is Chu’s King Kaolie.In conclusion,we agreed with WANG Yi,and thought Zhao Hun was written by SONG Yu.

KeyWords: SONG Yu; Zhao Hun; author;
参考文献

[1] 张正明.楚文化史[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1987.

[2] 冀凡.《招魂》,招顷襄王说[J].黄石教育学院学报,1987,(1):38-43.

[3] 潘啸龙.《招魂》研究商榷[J].文学评论,1994,(4):35-43.

[4] 班固.汉书·地理志[M].北京:中华书局,1983.

[5] 陈子展.招魂试解[A].中华文史论从[M].北京:中华书局,1983.

[6] 司马迁.史记·秦本纪[M].北京:中华书局,1975.

[7] 胡文英.屈骚指掌[M].北京:北京古籍出版社,1975.

[8] 郦道元.水经注[M].北京:商务印书馆,1958.

[9] 范晔.后汉书·宋均传[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1986.

[10] 陆侃如.宋玉评传[J].小说月报,1927,17卷号外,1927.

[11] 司马迁.史记·春申君传[M].北京:中华书局,1975.

[12] 司马迁.史记·货殖传[M].北京:中华局,1975.

[13] 游国恩.楚辞概论·宋玉传略及其作品[M].北京:北京学术社,1926.

[14] 汉书·地理志[M].北京:中华书局,1983.

基本信息:

中图分类号:I207.22

引用信息:

[1]刘刚.宋玉作《招魂》说新证[J].鞍山师范学院学报,2001(04):52-56.

发布时间:

2001-12-05

出版时间:

2001-12-05

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文