| 173 | 7 | 24 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
80年代以来,庄子研究持续升温,成果卓著,并涉及哲学、文学等多种领域;宋玉研究也不甘落后, 但多集中于作品真伪的考辨,而把生活年代相近的庄子学派与宋玉同置于楚地文化场中,结合二者思想特 质和具体文本来做比较研究的却不多见。我们试图从庄子学派影响宋玉的可能性和宋玉对庄子学派的具 体继承两方面来论证二者的亲缘关系,以作抛砖之用。
Abstract：Since the ninteen-eighties,study and intensify continuously about Zoranzi,the achievement is distinguished,and involve many kinds of fields,such as philosophy,literature,etc.;Song Yu study is also unwilling to be lag behind,concentrate on works true and false,and put the close Zoranzi school and Song Yu of life times in the cultural playground of Chu clearly together,combine two thought specialty and concrete text,make comparative research but rare.We attempt to explore Zoranzi schools influence possibility on Song Yu and Song Yu’s concrete inherit two respect to demonstrate their intimate relations, in order to make many people to pay their attention.
[1]周振甫.文心雕龙注释[M].北京:人民文学出版社,2002.
[2]司马迁等.楚辞评论资料选[M].台北:长安出版社,1988.
[3]司马迁.史记[M].北京:中华书局,1965.
[4]淮南子[M].杭州:浙江书局,光绪二年.
[5]陈国庆.汉书艺文志注释汇编[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
[6]乐史.太平寰宇记[M].清刻本.
[7]黎靖德.朱子语类[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
[8]崔大华.庄子研究[M].北京:人民出版社,1997.
[9]诗经[M].北京:中国文史出版社,2003.
[10]陈鼓应.庄子今注今译[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
[11]黄惠贤.校补襄阳耆旧记[M].郑州:中州古籍出版社,1987.
[12]吴广平.宋玉集[M].长沙:岳麓书社,2001.
[13]刘鹗.老残游记[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1957.
[14]黄山文化书院.庄子与中国文化[M].合肥:安徽人民出版社,1990.
[15]王国维.屈子文学之精神[A].静庵文集续编[M].上海:上海古籍书店,1983.
基本信息:
中图分类号:I206.2
引用信息:
[1]王兵,张征.试论庄子学派与宋玉的亲缘关系[J].鞍山师范学院学报,2005(01):53-58.
2005-02-20
2005-02-20