鞍山师范学院学报

鉴于媒介学与诞生于20世纪50年代的媒介环境学在研究对象、目的和方法上的相似性，德布雷对“媒介”的概念进行了拓展，提炼出“媒介”的四层含义，并创造性地提出了两个学术名词——“媒介化”和“媒介域”。从媒介定义、研究问题和分析框架三个角度，对这两个领域的核心假设和关键概念进行比较研究，并结合整个学术史的发展脉络加以阐释。媒介学在以下两个方面富有创见：首先，媒介学将“媒介”定义为由“设备—载体—方法”组成的系统，一反此前媒介环境学对物质载体和技术设备的过度关注，突显了媒介本身所蕴含的社会文化属性；其次，为避免出现媒介环境学中的“媒介技术决定论”倾向，德布雷搭建了一个由传播工具和文化环境共同组成的分析框架——媒介域，用于分解和解读人类文明史，从而为弥合主体与客体、技术与文化之间的对立作出了有益尝试。

In view of the similarities between mediology and media ecology, which was born in the 1950s',in terms of research objects, purposes and methods, Debray expanded the concept of “media”,extracted four levels of the meaning of “media”,and creatively put forward two academic terms: “Mediatization” and “Mediasphere”.this paper comparesand studiesthe core assumptions and key concepts of the two fields from three perspectives: media definition, research questions and analysis framework, and explain them in the context of the development of the entire academic history.This paper believes that mediology is creative in the following two aspects.Firstly, mediology defines “media” as a system composed of “device-carrier-method”,which is contrary to the previous excessive attention to material carriers and technical equipment in media ecology, highlighting the social and cultural attributes contained in media itself.Secondly, in order to avoid the tendency of “Media Determinism” in media ecology, Debray built an analytical framework composed of communication tools and cultural environment: mediasphere, which is used to decompose and interpret the history of human civilization, thus making a useful attempt to bridge the opposition between subject and object, technology and culture.